Firecrawl is an open-source web data API that converts any website into LLM-ready markdown, JSON, or structured data with a single API call. We rate it 85/100 — it's the most developer-friendly scraping layer available for AI agent builders, RAG pipelines, and anyone who needs clean, token-efficient web data at scale.

What is Firecrawl?

Firecrawl was built by Eric Ciarla, Caleb Peffer, and Nicolas Silberstein Camara in January 2024, originally as an internal tool at their previous company Mendable — a Y Combinator-backed AI documentation search tool used by Snapchat, Coinbase, and MongoDB. The team quickly realized the web data extraction problem was bigger than one company's use case and spun Firecrawl out as a standalone product.

In August 2025, Firecrawl announced $14.5 million in Series A funding and now counts over 102,000 GitHub stars, making it one of the fastest-growing open-source developer tools of 2024–2025. The project is listed under the mendableai GitHub org, is MIT-licensed, and can be self-hosted or used via the managed API.

Firecrawl — Web Data API for AI agents: search, scrape, crawl, extract, and interact with any website — Firecrawl: turn any URL into LLM-ready markdown, JSON, or structured data — one API call away

Key Features of Firecrawl

Scrape Endpoint (/scrape): Converts a single URL into markdown, HTML, JSON, or a screenshot in seconds. Handles JavaScript-heavy pages via "Smart Wait" technology that detects when dynamic content (React, Vue, Next.js) has fully loaded before extracting — no manual wait conditions needed.
Crawl Endpoint (/crawl): Recursively crawls an entire website and returns all pages as clean markdown. Handles pagination, sitemaps, and link discovery automatically. Webhook support with HMAC-SHA256 signed payloads means large jobs don't require polling.
Search Endpoint (/search): Query the web and retrieve full page content from results in a single call — no need to chain a search API with a scraper. Costs 2 credits per 10 results.
Extract Endpoint (/extract): Uses AI to pull specific structured data from pages via natural language schema definitions. Pass a JSON schema and Firecrawl returns clean, validated output — useful for price monitoring, lead enrichment, and competitive intelligence.
Browser Sandbox: Gives AI agents a managed Chromium environment via CDP WebSocket, enabling full browser automation — clicking, scrolling, form filling — before data extraction. This is what powers Firecrawl's FIRE-1 web action agent.
MCP Integration: Firecrawl ships a Model Context Protocol server, making it trivially connectable to Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI environment without writing glue code.
LLM-Optimized Output: Markdown output uses ~67% fewer tokens than raw HTML — material savings when processing thousands of pages against GPT-4o, Claude, or Gemini.

Firecrawl mobile scraping — device emulation for extracting data from mobile-optimized websites — Firecrawl's mobile scraping mode: emulates iOS and Android viewports to access mobile-optimized content

What Users Say About Firecrawl

Developer sentiment on X (Twitter) and tech blogs is overwhelmingly positive. On GitHub, the project has accumulated over 102,000 stars since January 2024 — an extraordinary growth rate. On Product Hunt, Firecrawl received 500+ upvotes and comments consistently praise how reliably it handles JavaScript-rendered sites, with one developer noting it was "the first scraper that just worked" on their React-heavy target sites.

The most consistent criticism comes from the credit-based pricing system. Multiple independent reviews flag that using the /extract endpoint with AI schema parsing or enabling Stealth Mode can consume up to 5 credits per request — making budgets unpredictable at scale. Community feedback on Reddit's r/LocalLLaMA and r/MachineLearning also notes that automated browser interactions (clicking, scrolling) can be hit-or-miss on aggressively protected sites, and that the tool is inherently developer-first — non-technical teams cannot use it without engineering support.

Firecrawl Pricing

Firecrawl uses a credit-based model. One credit = one scraped page (or one PDF page). The free plan gives 500 lifetime credits — enough for testing but not production. All paid tiers are billed annually; the monthly rates listed are the annual equivalent.

Plan	Price/Month (billed yearly)	Credits/Month	Concurrent Requests
Free	$0 (lifetime)	500 total	2
Hobby	$16	3,000	5
Standard	$83	100,000	50
Growth	$333	500,000	100
Scale	$599	1,000,000	150
Enterprise	Custom	Custom	Custom + SLA

At the Standard tier, cost per page drops to $0.00083 — extremely competitive for clean LLM-ready output. Extra credits on Hobby cost $9 per 1,000; on Standard, $47 per 35,000.

Who Should Use Firecrawl?

Best for: AI engineers building agents, RAG pipelines, or AI-powered research tools; developers who need structured data from the open web for LLM workflows; teams building competitive intelligence, price monitoring, or lead enrichment products; open source builders who want to self-host a full-featured scraping stack.

Not ideal for: Non-technical teams who need a no-code scraping solution; companies targeting major social platforms (Instagram, YouTube, TikTok are explicitly blocked); workflows requiring scraping of sites with enterprise-grade anti-bot protection (Cloudflare Turnstile, DataDome); or teams with tight, predictable per-page budgets where variable credit consumption from AI-powered endpoints is a concern.

Pros and Cons of Firecrawl

Pros:

102,000+ GitHub stars and active maintenance — this isn't abandonware
JavaScript rendering handled automatically via Smart Wait — no manual wait time configuration
MCP server included — one-line integration with Claude, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible AI tool
Output uses ~67% fewer tokens than raw HTML — significant cost savings at scale
Self-hostable with full feature parity — no vendor lock-in
Generous free tier for prototyping (500 lifetime credits, no card required)

Cons:

Credit consumption is unpredictable: AI-powered endpoints (extract, stealth) can use up to 5× more credits than basic scraping
Struggles with aggressive enterprise bot protection (Cloudflare Turnstile, etc.)
Blocks scraping of major social platforms (Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn)
Browser automation (clicking, scrolling) is described as "hit-or-miss" by multiple independent reviewers
No native visual interface — requires developer setup

Alternatives to Firecrawl

Apify is the most feature-complete alternative with a large marketplace of pre-built actors, a visual workflow builder, and stronger enterprise bot-bypass capabilities — but it's significantly more expensive at scale. Crawl4AI is a fully open-source Python library with no API costs, ideal for self-hosted setups where cost is the primary concern but operational overhead is acceptable. Jina Reader offers a free URL-to-markdown conversion endpoint with no authentication required, making it a solid choice for simple single-URL scraping, but it lacks crawling, search, and structured extraction.

Verdict: Is Firecrawl Worth It?

For AI engineers who need reliable, LLM-ready web data, Firecrawl is the fastest path from URL to clean content. The API design is exemplary, the open-source codebase is actively maintained, and the MCP integration makes it first-class in any Claude or Cursor workflow. The 85/100 rating reflects a genuinely excellent product held back only by unpredictable credit consumption on advanced endpoints and known limitations against aggressive bot protection. Start with the free tier — 500 credits is enough to validate your use case without a credit card.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Firecrawl free?: Yes. Firecrawl offers a free plan with 500 lifetime credits — enough to scrape 500 pages. No credit card required. Paid plans start at $16/month (billed annually) for 3,000 monthly credits.
Is Firecrawl open source?: Yes. Firecrawl is open source under a permissive license, hosted at github.com/mendableai/firecrawl with 102,000+ stars. You can self-host the full stack.
How does Firecrawl compare to Apify?: Firecrawl is more developer-friendly with a cleaner API and better LLM-optimized output, while Apify has a larger pre-built actor marketplace and stronger anti-bot bypass for enterprise sites. For AI agent workflows, Firecrawl is usually the better choice; for complex scraping pipelines targeting protected sites, Apify's infrastructure may perform better.
Does Firecrawl handle JavaScript-rendered pages?: Yes. Firecrawl uses Smart Wait technology to detect when JavaScript-heavy pages (React, Vue, Next.js, Angular) have fully loaded before extracting content. This handles the vast majority of modern web apps without manual configuration.
What is a Firecrawl credit?: One credit = one scraped page or one PDF page. Search costs 2 credits per 10 results. AI-powered extraction (the /extract endpoint) or Stealth Mode can consume up to 5 credits per request. Credits do not roll over month to month on standard plans.

#llm

Firecrawl